Nuclear firm Sellafield has been fined £700,000 and ordered to pay more than £72,000 costs for sending bags of radioactive waste to a landfill site.

Image Source

Image Source

***************************************************************************

Sellafield fined for sending radioactive waste to landfill

Published on the 15 June
2013

The error was attributed to failures in leadership and management at the site.
The bags, which contained waste such as plastic, tissues and clothing, should have been sent to a specialist facility that treats and stores low-level radioactive waste. But instead a number of mistakes led to them being sent to Lillyhall landfill site which deals with conventional waste in Workington, Cumbria.
This breached the conditions of Sellafield’s environmental permit and the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations.
At Carlisle Crown Court the firm was fined £700,000 and ordered to pay an additional £72,635.34 costs.
Sellafield found the error was caused by the wrong configuration of a new monitor which passed the bags as “general” waste, making them exempt from strict disposal controls.
The Environment Agency and the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) carried out an investigation and the bags were retrieved from the landfill and returned to Sellafield.
They were then disposed of correctly.


Read More Here

Related articles

• Sellafield bosses play down near catastrophe (morningstaronline.co.uk)
• United Kingdom: Radioactive materials lost in more than 30 incidents over past decade (guardian.co.uk)
• UK watchdog admits losing nuclear materials dozens of times (rawstory.com)

Leak in Hanford double-shell tank getting worse

KING5.com

Credit: KING 5 News

Hanford Site in eastern Washington
Credit: SkyKING
An aerial view of part of the Hanford Site, looking east from the Columbia River toward the Central Plateau.

Access to the Hanford Site is restricted. The 586-square-mile reserve is one of the most contaminated places in the Western Hemisphere, thanks to decades of plutonium production for the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

by SUSANNAH FRAME / KING 5 News

Posted on June 13, 2013 at 11:11 AM

Updated Thursday, Jun 13 at 5:06 PM

The leak in a massive underground double-shell nuclear waste tank at the Hanford Site has grown significantly since the leak was first announced to the public last fall, according to sources who have seen new inspection video and photographs.
The tank -- known as AY-102 -- holds 860,000 gallons of radioactive waste generated during decades of plutonium production at the southeastern Washington reservation.

Read More Here

Related articles

• Leaks at Hanford getting worse according to reports (enformable.com)
• Hanford Nuclear Waste: Leak In Massive Double-Shell Tank Growing Significantly (infiniteunknown.net)
• The companies in charge of nuclear waste clean up at the Hanford Site hold contracts with the fed that offer no incentive for reporting problems, a dangerous climate in light of radioactive leaks, according to one of the nation's top nuclear policy exper (familysurvivalprotocol.com)
• Leak in Hanford double-shell tank getting worse (krem.com)
• TV: Leak at U.S. nuclear site "has grown substantially" - "The worst of the worst on planet" - "Much more bright green liquid than before" #Hanford (enenews.com)
• EneNews - TV: Leak At U.S. Nuclear Site "Has Grown Substantially" - "The Worst Of The Worst On Planet" - "Much More Bright Green Liquid Than Before" #Hanford - 14 June 2013 (lucas2012infos.wordpress.com)
• Hanford officials hid leak evidence from advisory panel (king5.com)
• No plan in place when leak alarm sounded at Hanford (krem.com)
• State ready to take action over leaking Hanford nuclear waste tank (krem.com)
• Hanford nuclear facility - a radioactive horror story (nuclear-news.net)

Bradwell-on-Sea identified as potential site to dump radioactive waste

Bradwell Power Station

Aerial view of the power station.

******************************************************************************

Nuclear Decommissioning Authority proposes use of Essex site to store intermediate level waste until 2040

• Terry Macalister
• The Guardian, Sunday 16 June 2013 15.25 EDT

The nuclear power station in Bradwell-on-Sea closed in 2002 and is being decommissioned. Photograph: Steve Morgan/Alamy

When it comes to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, the only way is Essex. Bradwell-on-Sea has been identified as a possible site to dump radioactive waste.
"Everybody was aghast when a local representative from the NDA stated that the possibility was being looked into," Brian Beale, a district councillor for Maldon, told the Essex Chronicle. "To say this could happen when it had always been understood that Bradwell was not intended to be a site for waste, created uproar."
Nuclear materials are already being stored at Bradwell, a former nuclear power station that closed in 2002 and is being decommissioned. The operating company, Magnox Electric, was fined £250,000 in 2009 for presiding over a radioactive leak that had gone undetected for 14 years.


Read More Here

Related articles

• Sizewell A: New nuclear waste store could be set for decommissioned site (eadt.co.uk)
• Sizewell: Defuelling reaches half way stage at nuclear site (eadt.co.uk)
• UK government's big gamble in subsidising new nuclear power (nuclear-news.net)
• Radioactive waste dumping into the world's oceans (nuclear-news.net)