Local and Global Community News – Activism / Protests - Animal Advocacy - Animal Rescue- Archaeology/Anthropology/Paleontology/Crypto-zoology , Corporate Assault on our Lives and Our Health, Environmental- Internet/IT - Signs of the Times – Wildlife : News Affiliate of Family Survival Protocol.com
Study: Dispersants did not help oil degrade in BP spill
November 9, 2015 by By Seth Borenstein
Samantha Joye, a professor of marine sciences in the University of
Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, studies the oil plumes
generated by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout. Credit: Todd
Dickey/University of Georgia The chemical
sprayed on the 2010 BP oil spill may not have helped crucial
petroleum-munching microbes get rid of the slick, a new study suggests.
And
that leads to more questions about where much of the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill went. If the new results are true, up to half the oil can't be
accounted for, said the author of a new study on the spill in the Gulf
of Mexico.
After the 172 million gallon (650 million liter) spill,
the chemical dispersant Corexit 9500 was applied by airplane on the
slick to help it go away and help natural microbes in the water eat the
oil faster. The oil appeared to dissipate, but scientists and government
officials didn't really monitor the microbes and chemicals, said
University of Georgia marine scientist Samantha Joye.
So Joye and
colleagues recreated the application in a lab, with the dispersant, BP
oil and water from the gulf, and found that it didn't help the microbes
at all and even hurt one key oil-munching bug, according to a study
published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"The
dispersants did a great job in that they got the oil off the surface,"
Joye said. "What you see is the dispersants didn't ramp up
biodegradation."
In fact, she found the oil with no dispersant "degraded a heckuva lot faster than the oil with dispersants," Joye said.
Since then we have seen little accountability, despite a nominal fine
against BP for its role in unleashing 4 million barrels of oil (approx.
200 million gallons). In fact, the EPA lifted a ban which subsequently
resulted in BP being awarded $40 Billion in new contracts, essentially erasing all that was “lost” by BP from their criminality.
Running in tandem with BP’s negligence was the use of Corexit 9500 oil dispersant (owned by Nalco, a Goldman Sachs subsidiary)
as a supposed means to drastically minimize the impact. Contrary to
that assertion, evidence continues to mount that it did the exact
opposite.
Early on, reports began to
surface of health anomalies that many believed were attributable to the
spraying of the chemical dispersant. Corexit was not only sprayed over
the water, but over houses as well. One family documented how all of them became sickened,
and afterward tested very high for chemical poisoning. A crew of
activists called Project Gulf Impact were on the scene to expose what
was taking place, and similarly reported sickness to their own crew, as well as suppression of their media coverage.
BP
is still awaiting a US court ruling about whether it was grossly
negligent over the Deepwater Horizon blowout in 2010. Photograph:
AFP/Getty Images
BP
is closer to restoring its operations and reputation in the US after
agreeing a deal with environmental protection authorities that it will
enable the oil firm to bid for new drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico.
The
British-based group had started legal proceedings against the US
environmental protection agency (EPA) which had banned BP from new
contracts on the grounds that it had failed to correct problems properly
since the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010.
BP said it had now
dropped its law suit after resolving outstanding problems with the EPA
but the firm will have to abide by monitoring arrangements with the
agency for the next five years.
"After a lengthy negotiation, BP
is pleased to have reached this resolution, which we believe to be fair
and reasonable," said John Mingé, head of BP America. "Today's agreement
will allow America's largest energy investor to compete again for federal contracts and leases."
Government Declares BP a 'Responsible' Contractor: Workers and Taxpayers Beware
Posted:
Updated:
A scant five days before the Department of Interior opens a new round of bids
for oil leases in the Gulf of Mexico, the EPA has blinked, pronouncing
BP, the incorrigible corporate scofflaw of the new millennium, once
again fit to do business with the government.
To get right to the
point, the federal government's decision that BP has somehow paid its
debt and should once again be eligible for federal contracts is a
disgrace. Not only does it let BP off the hook, it sends an unmistakable
signal to the rest of the energy industry: That no matter how much harm
you do, no matter how horrid your safety record, the feds will cut you
some slack.
Back in 2012, the agency's intrepid staff had finally
gotten permission to pull the trigger on the company, de-barring it from
holding any new U.S. contracts on the grounds that it was not running
its business in a "responsible" way. Undoubtedly under pressure by the
Cameron government and the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency, BP's most
loyal customer, the EPA settled its debarment suit for a sweet little
consent decree that will try to improve the company's sense of ethics by
having "independent" auditors come visit once a year. To review the grim record:
BP, now the third-largest energy company in the world, is the first
among the roster of companies that have caused the most memorable
industrial fiascos in the post-modern age.
Its best-known
disaster, the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon, a drilling rig
moored in the Gulf of Mexico that BP had hired to develop its lease of
the Macondo well, killed 11 and deposited 205 million gallons of crude
oil along the southern coast of the United States -- the worst
environmental disaster in American history.
In a
troubling precursor, another explosion killed 15 and injured 180 at the
company's Texas City refinery in July 2005. This incident happened even
after the plant manager there had gone on bended knee to John Manzoni,
BP's second in command worldwide, to plead for money to address severe
maintenance problems that jeopardized safety at that plant after a
consultant surveying refinery workers reported that many thought they
ran a real risk of being killed at work. Those fears were warranted, it
turned out.
Also in 2005, 200,000 gallons of oil spilled from a BP pipeline on Alaska's North Slope.