By Michael Conathan, Guest Blogger on
November 4, 2013 at 10:24 am
A tanker offloads oil into the Portland-Montreal Pipeline alongside South Portland, Maine’s Bug Light Park.
CREDIT: Michael Conathan
SOUTH PORTLAND, MAINE — On Tuesday, approximately 25,000 residents of
South Portland will decide the future of what could soon become
America’s next tar sands pipeline. Not Keystone XL; the
Portland-Montreal Pipeline.
In 1941, as Germany choked off Canada’s fuel supply during the early
stages of World War II, the U.S. opened a pipeline to allow imported
crude to flow from Maine to Montreal. Today, that same pipeline has made
Portland the
second biggest oil port
on the eastern seaboard. Tankers steam into Casco Bay almost daily,
navigating among lobster buoys and kayakers, and dwarfing the fishing
boats that once lined the waterfront of Maine’s largest city.
But as natural gas has begun to replace heating oil in the northeast,
and as Canada has moved aggressively to tap the Alberta tar sands,
demand for imported oil is declining. And the pipeline’s owners and
operators smell a new source of business: reversing the pipeline’s flow
to send tar sands to Maine for export.
In June, nearly
4,000 South Portland residents responded to the threat that their hometown could serve as the next spigot for some of the
dirtiest fuel on the planet
by signing a petition to get a measure known as the Waterfront
Protection Ordinance included on this year’s ballot, which would amend
the city code to prevent the construction of a tar sands export facility
at the end of the pipeline.
Larry Wilson, the pipeline company’s CEO, has repeatedly insisted
that there are no current plans to use his infrastructure to move tar
sands, but such a move is clearly at least on the drawing board. Wilson
has
repeatedly asserted
that his organization is “aggressively looking for every opportunity —
and that could involve a reversal” to ship tar sands south.
Towns along the pipeline’s route
from Quebec, through Vermont and New Hampshire, and down into Maine
have already made official statements of opposition to the proposal.
Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin wrote to Secretary of State John Kerry in June, asking him to block any move to ship tar sands through the pipeline.
Maine’s neighbors fear becoming the next Mayflower, Arkansas or
Kalamazoo, Michigan. Both of those towns are still dealing with the
aftermath of tar sands spills from pipelines that are
wreaking havoc on public health and proving all but impossible to clean up. In the case of Kalamazoo, the process has lasted
more than three years and cost over a billion dollars, and the bottom of the Kalamazoo River remains choked with tar sands as thick as molasses.
However, resolutions by the pipeline’s pass-through communities are
non-binding on the company. As the terminus and the municipality where
oil would be stored, treated, and loaded on tankers, South Portland is
uniquely positioned to influence the company’s ability to move tar
sands.

Local
efforts have the pipeline company circling the wagons. Opponents of the
Waterfront Protection Ordinance, united as the Working Waterfront
Coalition, have
outspent supporters six to one
over the course of the campaign, spending $600,000 in cash and in-kind
donations which have come exclusively from corporate entities and their
affiliates, including the American Petroleum Institute.
Read More Here